[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation: Superfluous bindings in Exchanges

Laing, Michael P. Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Thu Jul 19 20:01:06 BST 2012

Thanks Mathias, I have sent reports to you separately. -ml

On 7/19/12 2:36 PM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

>On 19/07/12 19:21, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> I see that federation creates many bindings to facilitate sending only
>> relevant messages.
>> However, I note that at least some bindings do not get removed when no
>> longer applicable.
>> In my current environment, described previously, participating apps
>> create exclusive queues on the global exchange in their vhost; they
>> typically bind with a uuid in addition to other bindings.
>> This works fine, except I notice that, although some bindings go away
>> when the exclusive queue is deleted, lots more remain with that uuid.
>> This cruft is building up.
>Needless to say that shouldn't happen. This is the first report of such
>a problem we have received. Please get us a copy of 'rabbitmqctl report'
>run against both the downstream and the upstream when the above has

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list