[rabbitmq-discuss] slave_nodes and synchronised_slave_nodes from HTTP API - Something's odd:
simon at rabbitmq.com
Wed Jan 25 18:15:15 GMT 2012
On 25/01/12 17:37, Matt Pietrek wrote:
> Following on to an earlier thread
> (Thanks Simon!), I've found something interesting.
> In one case (the "VMMunger" queue below), the returned 'slave_nodes'
> field is empty, while the 'synchronised_slave_nodes' field is
> 'rabbit at play2'. In other words, exactly the *opposite* of what you'd
> expect if the queue was not in sync. The strangeness is further
> corroborated by the copy/paste results of the Queues tab in the Web
> management UI, which reports that the VMMunger queue *is* in sync:
Well, the UI is just basing that on what it got from the HTTP API. In
general synchronised_slave_nodes should be a subset of slave_nodes.
However the mgmt plugin gets the data from different sources, so you may
have found a bug. What does rabbitmqctl show in this situation? (It goes
via a different route.) Can you reproduce it?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss