[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP doesn't include the routing-key on MESSAGE frames

Steve Powell steve at rabbitmq.com
Mon Feb 27 10:56:09 GMT 2012


Read your patch, and prefer this solution to adding extra headers.

I'm raising a bug (24763) to fix our spec-compliance problem (thank you for
pointing this out), and see if we can get this change in.

Steve Powell
steve at rabbitmq.com
[wrk: +44-2380-111-528] [mob: +44-7815-838-558]

On 20 Feb 2012, at 20:36, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> How about the attached patch? It attempts to bring the "destination"
> header in MESSAGEs in to line with the STOMP 1.1 spec. I've paid
> cursory attention to binary-and-slash-escaping issues but it could use
> a second glance before being committed, I reckon.
> Regards,
>  Tony
> On 20 February 2012 14:56, Tony Garnock-Jones
> <tonygarnockjones+rabbitmq at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Adding the routing_key puts the final small missing piece in place. A
>> perhaps more STOMPish way of giving it would be to have a "to" header
>> or similar carried in a MESSAGE, containing the full destination given
>> in the SEND. Oh wait! I've just checked, and actually that's what's
>> required by the 1.1 spec already. So the STOMP adapter isn't quite
>> spec-compliant, in that it's giving the destination from the
>> *subscribe* rather than the *send*.
> -- 
> Tony Garnock-Jones
> tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
> http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/
> <better-destination-patch.patch>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list