[rabbitmq-discuss] Exchange and queue naming conventions

[Matthias Radestock]

On 30/08/12 23:43, Jerry Kuch wrote:
> You might consider having producers use the mandatory flag.  That way if
> it's not possible for Rabbit to put the message into at least one queue,
> you'll get it sent back to you via a basic.return and the producer can
> rethink its life choices accordingly.

Or *both* producer and consumer could declare the required exchanges, 
queues and bindings.

Obviously that only works if they both a) have the required knowledge, 
and b) are sufficiently trusted.

Matthias.