[rabbitmq-discuss] Exchange and queue naming conventions

Matthias Radestock matthias at rabbitmq.com
Fri Aug 31 07:46:21 BST 2012

On 30/08/12 23:43, Jerry Kuch wrote:
> You might consider having producers use the mandatory flag.  That way if
> it's not possible for Rabbit to put the message into at least one queue,
> you'll get it sent back to you via a basic.return and the producer can
> rethink its life choices accordingly.

Or *both* producer and consumer could declare the required exchanges, 
queues and bindings.

Obviously that only works if they both a) have the required knowledge, 
and b) are sufficiently trusted.


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list