[rabbitmq-discuss] AMQP 1.0 Support
gsim at redhat.com
Mon Apr 23 13:41:48 BST 2012
On 04/21/2012 03:04 AM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
>> I'll take lack of anything more specific as confirmation that ZMQ does not offer primitives for reliability but deliberately leaves that to applications themselves
> Durable yes is up to the app, but reliability and durability are not the same thing. I'll take the lack of distinction as you painting them to be the same.
I'm not concerned with durability here (or I would have said so), but
I see nothing in the API reference or the protocol specification to
corroborate the assertion that ZMQ has similar primitives for
reliability to AMQP.
The guide discusses reliability patterns that applications can build
themselves given ZMQ does not provide primitives for that. (I'm not
criticising that decision, merely clarifying the facts).
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss