[rabbitmq-discuss] AMQP 1.0 Support

Gordon Sim gsim at redhat.com
Mon Apr 23 13:41:48 BST 2012

On 04/21/2012 03:04 AM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
>> I'll take lack of anything more specific as confirmation that ZMQ does not offer primitives for reliability but deliberately leaves that to applications themselves
> Durable yes is up to the app, but reliability and durability are not the same thing. I'll take the lack of distinction as you painting them to be the same.

I'm not concerned with durability here (or I would have said so), but 
with _reliability_.

I see nothing in the API reference or the protocol specification to 
corroborate the assertion that ZMQ has similar primitives for 
reliability to AMQP.

The guide discusses reliability patterns that applications can build 
themselves given ZMQ does not provide primitives for that. (I'm not 
criticising that decision, merely clarifying the facts).

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list