[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmq-ha-test setup

[Alexis Richardson]

Brad

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Brad Knowles <bknowles at ihiji.com> wrote:
> Personally, I don't want my programmers to have to know anything about the underlying implementation of how HA is provided, all they need to know is that I'm making sure that it's there.  The pacemaker solution is a bit of a kludgey way to do that, IMO.  And I definitely want our failover to be active/active and not active/passive.

Right.

> If you can point me at the appropriate thread, I will definitely try to make some suitable comments over there.  Thanks!

The nub starts here:
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/2011-September/014808.html


>> That aside, I would urge you to write a round robin exchange ;-)
>
> In the DevOps field, I'm much more of an Ops type than a Dev type.  I can hope to understand some of the underlying infrastructure concepts and how things are logically put together, but I don't hold out much hope that I'll be able to write actual code to do that.

Understood.  If the above thread is not suggestive of a better line of
attack, please do articulate your requirements here ;-)

a