[rabbitmq-discuss] New to RabbitMq questions
simon at rabbitmq.com
Mon Oct 31 16:13:09 GMT 2011
On 31/10/11 16:00, Chris Chiappone wrote:
> I had figured that could be the case. I don't think firehose is probably
> the answer for us since I don't want to worry about performance issues.
Hmm, that warning is perhaps rather strongly worded...
> I think we can set up exchanges for clients and bind to them before they
> even connect so that may be the way to go. Is there limits to the number
> of exchanges a client can bind to?
Well, queues bind to exchanges. But there's no hard limit on that.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss