[rabbitmq-discuss] [announcement] amq-client 0.8.5 is released

[Matthias Radestock]

On 28/10/11 16:40, Michael Klishin wrote:
> Given that this scenario only happens when consumers are added and
> removed aggressively and explicit acknowledgements are used, to me it
> sounds like a reasonable trade-off that wins us time.

Except you have turned a problem that is reported against the amqp gem 
(which is indeed where the problem resides) into one that will likely be 
reported against rabbitmq (which is not at fault).

Matthias.