[rabbitmq-discuss] Pika basic.recover broken?
Edward Hope-Morley
zedhm at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Oct 21 09:45:33 BST 2011
So does that mean that RabbitMQ mandates a requeue for basic.recover? I
am unclear as to what the implications of a requeue are. How does the
server chose which queue to requeue too and under what circumstances
will it do so?
On 20/10/11 23:34, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:32:55PM +0100, E Hope-Morley wrote:
>> Hi, when I do a basic.recover with no requeue arg i.e. requeue=False my channel closes with the following error:
>>
>> code: 540
>> text: NOT_IMPLEMENTED - requeue=false
>>
>> It works fine if I do requeue=True. Any ideas?
> Rabbit does not implement recover with requeue=false. It's not a client
> thing, it's the server.
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list