[rabbitmq-discuss] publisher confirmations

[Roey Berman]

I've created a pull request which fixes the demo:
https://github.com/pika/pika/pull/109

Note:
The stable pika release (0.9.5) doesn't add the Basic.Nack and
Confirm.SelectOk callbacks when you call channel.confirm_delivery()
you'll explicitly have to call channel.add_callback(on_delivered,
['Basic.Nack', 'Confirm.SelectOk'])

Would you recommend using the git master version of pika or 0.9.5 for a
production environment?

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Roey Berman <roey.berman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks again for the quick response.
>
> I also read http://www.rabbitmq.com/extensions.html#publishing before
> posting this question.
>
> But again my problem is with simulating server nacks so i can create a
> test case for my code.
>
> Do you have any idea how I can do that?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Marek Majkowski <majek04 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:11, Roey Berman <roey.berman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Oh one fix:
>> > self.chan.basic_publish(message, **kwargs)
>> -> self.chan.basic_publish(body =
>> > message, **kwargs)
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Roey Berman <roey.berman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the quick reply.
>> >> At first I used the code from the example you referred me to but it
>> >> doesn't handle the "multiple" flag and NAcks from the server.
>> >> I know my code handles the "multiple" flag, but don't know about NAcks.
>> >> I don't really know how to test for nacks since I've never gotten them
>> >> from rabbitmq server.
>>
>> http://www.rabbitmq.com/extensions.html#publishing
>>
>> "In exceptional cases when the broker is unable to handle messages
>> successfully, instead of a basic.ack, the broker will send a
>> basic.nack. In this context, fields of the basic.nack have the same
>> meaning as the corresponding ones in basic.ack and the requeue field
>> should be ignored. By nack'ing one or more messages, the broker
>> indicates that it was unable to process the messages and refuses
>> responsibility for them; at that point, the client may choose to
>> re-publish the messages.
>>
>> After a channel is put into confirm mode, all subsequently published
>> messages will be confirmed or nack'd once. No guarantees are made as
>> to how soon a message is confirmed. No message will be both confirmed
>> and nack'd."
>>
>> That's all I know.
>>
>>
>> >> Once I know my code handles all responses correctly I will create a
>> pull
>> >> request for the pika example code.
>>
>> Good!
>>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Marek Majkowski <majek04 at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not sure if it works - but the pika example showing
>> >>> publisher confirms usage looks rather similar:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/pika/pika/blob/120fdea5913e7ed80536ff55634ab0f8f4554e79/examples/demo_send_confirmed.py
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheer,
>> >>>  Marek
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 15:20, bergundy <roey.berman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi everyone,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I couldn't find code for implementing publisher confirmations.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I wrote this piece of code using pika 0.9.5 (python client).
>> >>> > Would like to get feedback on this, I hope I got it right ...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ---
>> >>> > class ConfirmingProducer(object):
>> >>> >    def __init__(self, channel):
>> >>> >        self.delivery_tag = 1
>> >>> >        self.acked        = 0
>> >>> >        self._callbacks   = {}
>> >>> >        self.chan = channel
>> >>> >        self.chan.confirm_delivery(self.on_delivered)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >    def publish(self, message, callback, **kwargs):
>> >>> >        self._callbacks[self.delivery_tag] = callback
>> >>> >        self.delivery_tag += 1
>> >>> >        self.chan.basic_publish(message, **kwargs)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >    def on_delivered(self, frame):
>> >>> >        success = isinstance(frame.method, pika.spec.Basic.Ack)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >        if frame.method.multiple:
>> >>> >            for dtag in range(self.acked+1, frame.method.delivery_tag
>> >>> > +1):
>> >>> >                self._callbacks.pop(dtag)(success)
>> >>> >            self.acked = frame.method.delivery_tag
>> >>> >        else:
>> >>> >            self._callbacks.pop(frame.method.delivery_tag)(success)
>> >>> >            self.acked += 1
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> >>> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> >>> >
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20111129/363a6253/attachment.htm>