[rabbitmq-discuss] Clustering of Rabbit MQ on thwo physical boxes.
Simon MacMullen
simon at rabbitmq.com
Wed Nov 16 13:33:50 GMT 2011
On 16/11/11 12:00, GS wrote:
> I had a question about clustering rabbit on two separate physical
> machine. The OS is unix. I was going through some blogs like
> http://www.godlikemouse.com/2010/12/14/how-to-cluster-rabbit-mq/ and
> it says that you have to change the /etc/hosts file. My organization
> does not permits that change. IS it still possible to have a cluster
> setup on two separate physical machines, without changing the /etc/
> hosts file?
Yes. That blog seems slightly confused. The point is that RabbitMQ will
identify each cluster node based on its short (non-fully-qualified)
hostname, and thus these hostnames are expected to resolve to the
correct IP addresses. (I would argue that if they don't then your
network is broken.) The blog author was presumably on a network where
this was not the case, and used /etc/hosts hacking to fix it.
> Are the steps mentioned at http://www.rabbitmq.com/clustering.html
> sufficient?
They certainly should be.
> I am not doubting the content, but my experience of
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/clustering.html#single-machine was not good.
Hmm. Clustering on a single machine is more painful: you have to make
sure that the multiple copies of RabbitMQ that you're running don't
clash on any ports, store data in different locations, etc. That
requires a bit of fiddling. It's still possible but it's easier to get
something wrong and thus not even be able to start all your nodes.
Cheers, Simon
--
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, VMware
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list