[rabbitmq-discuss] Pathological dead queue behavior in a cluster.
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Thu Mar 31 05:41:44 BST 2011
Matthew Sackman wrote:
> Binding recreation is dependent on both the exchange and queue being
> durable, even if the exchange survives due to the fact it's part of a
Simon and I were discussing that very scenario today and concluded that
rabbit is probably exhibiting the wrong behaviour here. I have filed a bug.
An interesting related issue is whether a client should be able to
add/remove bindings for such queues while they are unavailable. I reckon
the answer is 'no'.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss