[rabbitmq-discuss] Pathological dead queue behavior in a cluster.

Jason J. W. Williams jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 23:14:16 BST 2011

> > It looks like there's an extra binding that doesn't get recreated.
> Binding recreation is dependent on both the exchange and queue being
> durable, even if the exchange survives due to the fact it's part of a
> cluster.

That would make sense. I was under the (erroneous) impression making the
exchange durable only mattered if the exchange was lost (e.g. cluster went
down or a standalone node failed). Thank you for working through it with me.
I'll see what we can do about getting cancellation notifications into Pika
and the book.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110330/d3ffb936/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list