[rabbitmq-discuss] Pathological dead queue behavior in a cluster.

[Jason J. W. Williams]

>
> > It looks like there's an extra binding that doesn't get recreated.
>
> Binding recreation is dependent on both the exchange and queue being
> durable, even if the exchange survives due to the fact it's part of a
> cluster.


That would make sense. I was under the (erroneous) impression making the
exchange durable only mattered if the exchange was lost (e.g. cluster went
down or a standalone node failed). Thank you for working through it with me.
I'll see what we can do about getting cancellation notifications into Pika
and the book.

-J
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110330/d3ffb936/attachment.htm>