[rabbitmq-discuss] Reddit news
marcel.meyer at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 23:09:01 GMT 2011
Thanks for the info Marek.
So how does Rabbit 2+ deal with saturation?
On 3/14/11, Marek Majkowski <majek04 at gmail.com> wrote:
> From what I understood, they run into a pretty common misunderstanding.
> Basically the system that consumed messages, for some
> reason, was too slow. That, obviously, put a lot of stress
> on RabbitMQ, and as it was before rabbit 2.0, at some point
> Rabbit just died due to out-of-memory situation.
> Reddit guys were unhappy to see Rabbit go down, but
> in fact Rabbit was not the source of their problems.
> It was just a side-effect of something else misbehaving.
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 19:30, Marcel Meyer <marcel.meyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Great! Do you know whether this was documented as some anti-pattern? Is
>> there more about the specific issues they faced?
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis at rabbitmq.com>
>>> Hi Marcel
>>> Yes, I believe so. Matthew went to see them. As I recall the main
>>> issues were actually not with Rabbit, but some of how they had used
>>> messaging was worth discussing.
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Marcel Meyer <marcel.meyer at gmail.com>
>>> > Hi there Rabbit Community,
>>> > I am researching queues and found this thread about reddit's gripes
>>> > (http://www.reddit.com/tb/c2spc) and noticed that RabbitMQ Support
>>> > reached
>>> > out to them.
>>> > Were there issues resolved? They upgraded ERTS as a "stopgap" fix, but
>>> > wanted to yank the technology all together. Did they?
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Marcel
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>>> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>>> > https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss