[rabbitmq-discuss] Distribution model advice sought
Mark J. Reed
markjreed at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 14:39:06 GMT 2011
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> The problem I'm seeing is that the surviving nodes seem to remember that
>> the queue was declared on the dead node and fail when attempting to
>> declare it again.
> That should only happen when the queue is durable. Given that losing the odd
> message isn't a concern for you, it would make sense to declare the queues
> as non-durable.
Hm; I'm not declaring the queue as durable. Let me dig up some
detailed error/log output...
Mark J. Reed <markjreed at gmail.com>
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss