[rabbitmq-discuss] Patching rabbitmq to get more information about framing exceptions

[Michael Klishin]

2011/7/21 Matthias Radestock <matthias at rabbitmq.com>

>
> That's curious. Both should cause rabbit to complain with the "expected
> method frame, got non method frame instead" error. Are you sure you are
> seeing different behaviour here? If so, please send through the pcap files
> showing the entire tcp session.
>

Yes, I am very much sure. I have spent hours investigating this thing and
ran it probably hundreds of times. Will do.


>
> Content body frames should never be zero length. If the content length is
> zero then no content body frame should be sent at all, just a header.


Ah, yes, I read this line in the spec but then the fact that another Ruby
client that *also sends an empty content body frame* works fine confused me.

So for a blank string payload, the sequence is always

[method frame] [content header frame]

not

[method frame] [content header frame] [content body frame with size = 0]

correct?
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110721/9c1cd2f8/attachment.htm>