[rabbitmq-discuss] Feedback on STOMP changes

[Rob Harrop]

We are adding support for reply-to destinations just like ActiveMQ and 
Apollo.

Clients will not have to ensure that queue names are unique - this will 
be handled by the broker.

Michael Justin wrote:
> Am 24.06.2011 15:33, Rob Harrop wrote:
>
>> We'll add support for durable, exclusive, auto-delete and everything
>
> Would this include creation of "temporary queues", which exist only for
> the duration of the connection?
>
> If yes, does the client have to ensure that the temporary queue name is
> unique?
>
> In Stomp implementations for ActiveMQ and OpenMQ, the server creates the
> queue name and adds it as "reply-to" header to the messages (see
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HORNETQ-381)
>
> Regards