[rabbitmq-discuss] 0.9.1, recover-async vs. recover
Simon MacMullen
simon at rabbitmq.com
Tue Jan 18 16:20:51 GMT 2011
On 18/01/11 16:17, Aaron Westendorf wrote:
> The specification for these two methods is somewhat confusing. The
> descriptions imply that basic.recover is a synchronous method, but it
> is not specified as such. Anyone have insight on this?
Ugh.
recover *is* synchronous, I promise you :)
But it looks like the spec XML file contains an error; it is not marked
as such.
Cheers, Simon
--
Simon MacMullen
Staff Engineer, RabbitMQ
SpringSource, a division of VMware
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list