[rabbitmq-discuss] 0.9.1, recover-async vs. recover

Simon MacMullen simon at rabbitmq.com
Tue Jan 18 16:20:51 GMT 2011

On 18/01/11 16:17, Aaron Westendorf wrote:
> The specification for these two methods is somewhat confusing.  The
> descriptions imply that basic.recover is a synchronous method, but it
> is not specified as such.  Anyone have insight on this?


recover *is* synchronous, I promise you :)

But it looks like the spec XML file contains an error; it is not marked 
as such.

Cheers, Simon
Simon MacMullen
Staff Engineer, RabbitMQ
SpringSource, a division of VMware

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list