[rabbitmq-discuss] Is the C client a show-stopper for rabbit?
Eberhard Wolff
eberhard.wolff at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 13:23:42 GMT 2011
Hi Jiri,
On 15.02.11 12:50, jiri.krutil.ext at deutsche-boerse.com remarked:
> 1. It has a C++ broker which should supposedly be faster than Erlang. I
> personaly don't think that C++ always means faster, but some people here
> do.
Benchmarks are always hard of course but there is the somewhat famous
comparison of Erlang and C++ at Motorola:
http://www.slideshare.net/Arbow/comparing-cpp-and-erlang-for-motorola-telecoms-software
Erlang was invented for telco applications and I believe the
characteristics of telco applications are the same as for message
brokers i.e. high concurrency, high availability etc. So I think the
prejudice against Erlang's performance is not really justifiable.
Just my 0.02€ of course,
Eberhard
--
Eberhard Wolff Contradiction Is Balance Skype: ebr.wolff
Blog: http://JandIandMe.blogspot.com/
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list