[rabbitmq-discuss] it correct way to creating consumer as an daemon thread?

[Alexandru Scvorţov]

Hi,

That would work.  Alternatively, you could just subclass
QueueingConsumer or DefaultConsumer.  Doing this would give you more
fine-grained control over the connection.  For instance, if this is a
long running daemon, you should take into account connection failure, so
you'd need to override handleShutdownSignal.  Also, unless you
basicConsume with autoAck enabled, don't forget to ack the deliveries.

> consumer that are infinite run and
> poll queue where message are arrives.

That's not polling.  You could use basicGet instead of basicConsume.
*That* would be polling and it would be less efficient than consuming.
So, you're doing the right thing.

Cheers,
Alex

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:15:25PM -0800, sam_mis wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> i am using Rabbitmq Java client library. consumer that are infinite run and
> poll queue where message are arrives.
> 
> 
>          boolean runInfinite = true;
>          while (runInfinite)
>           {
>                  QueueingConsumer.Delivery task;
>              try 
>                {
>                task= consumer.nextDelivery();
>                } 
>              catch (InterruptedException ie) 
>                {
>                continue;
>                }
>          }
> consumer infinitely run i want to make it daemon thread.it is correct way to
> make it daemon thread and there are other option.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/it-correct-way-to-creating-consumer-as-an-daemon-thread--tp30870170p30870170.html
> Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss