[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ and Camel not working?

[David Harrigan]

I see,

so if I can force my client to talk using 0-91 then all should be well?

-=david=-

On 14 December 2011 15:02, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> On 14/12/11 14:49, David Harrigan wrote:
>>
>> The RabbitMQ logs simply report:
>>
>> =ERROR REPORT==== 14-Dec-2011::14:21:55 ===
>> exception on TCP connection<0.1141.0>  from 127.0.0.1:45985
>> {bad_version,1,1,0,10}
>
>
> That suggests that the camel client is trying to connect using AMQP 0-10,
> which we don't support.
>
> I'm not sure whether it can be made to speak 0-9-1, the logs you posted
> suggest it sometimes thinks it is:
>
>
>> [org.apache.qpid.client.AMQConnection    ] [502 ] - Looking up
>> delegate 'org.apache.qpid.client.AMQConnectionDelegate_9_1' Based on
>> PE:9-1
>
>>       [java] 14:21:55.602 [mol-router] INFO
>> [o.a.q.client.protocol.AMQProtocolSession] [398 ] - Setting
>> ProtocolVersion to :0-91
>
> ...but sometimes it thinks it isn't:
>
>
>>       [java] 14:21:55.600 [mol-router] INFO
>> [org.apache.qpid.client.AMQConnection    ] [384 ] - Connecting with
>> ProtocolHandler Version:0-10
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss



-- 
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9

"It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
of electrons were inconvenienced.