[rabbitmq-discuss] missing header frame

Mon Aug 29 16:09:00 BST 2011

Thank you for your response... I upgraded to a newer RabbitMQ and haven't
seen these issues since.

thanks

dominic

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Michael Klishin <
michael.s.klishin at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/8/19 Dominic Metzger <dominic at rightscale.com>
>
>> Is there a valid case when I wouldn't receive a header frame? Does it have
>> something to do with the redelivery of the message? I am seeing this on
>> RabbitMQ version (v1.7.2).
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> ["receive",
>>  #<AMQP::Frame::Method:0x11d58b24
>>   @channel=1,
>>   @payload=
>>    #<AMQP::Protocol::Basic::Deliver:0x11d58660
>>     @consumer_tag="example.com-events--588378867313",
>>     @debug=1,
>>     @delivery_tag=7700,
>>     @exchange="events",
>>     @redelivered=true,
>>     @routing_key="">>]
>>
>> ["receive",
>>  #<AMQP::Frame::Body:0x11aa54f4
>>   @channel=1,
>>   @payload=
>>    "{\"timestamp\":1313535484445309}">]
>>
>>
>> thanks & best regards
>>
>
> I haven't read AMQP 0.8 spec (which is what amqp gem before 0.8.0.RCs
> implements) in a while but I cannot think of a case when the header may be
> missing. My only suggestion is to not rely on "logging" of various clients
> because they use different frame class names, framing strategies and so on.
> Use Wireshark, it will tell you what is really going up and down the wire.
> And, maybe upgrade to RabbitMQ 2.5.1 that still supports AMQP 0.8 as well as
> AMQP 0.9.1.
>
> --
> MK
>
> http://github.com/michaelklishin
> http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110829/7d0a11a8/attachment.htm>