No subject
Tue Apr 12 10:32:41 BST 2011
and that clustering across the WAN should not be done. I've been pointed at=
the shovel plugin to handle communications from one data center to the oth=
er. I've been experimenting with shovel a little to figure out how to do th=
is, but I seem to have a loop going on where a published message from datac=
enter A goes to datacenter B, but then B goes ahead and shovels it right ba=
ck to A (more than 800 times per second).
I've seen a video from 2009 (Tony Garnock-Jones) that discusses this and in=
dicated that shovel was being modified to only handle this scenario to look=
at some labels to determine if the message has been to the current node, a=
nd just drop it if it has. This change does not appear to have happened, u=
nless I'm missing something.
Does anyone have a similar scenario or know how to handle high availability=
peer-to-peer connections across a WAN with RabbitMQ?
-Wes
--_000_094044328C95D248A8E9678F35A6ACB54463C847F7SLCMAILBOXech_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=
=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micros=
oft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vli=
nk=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>Situation:<o:p><=
/o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Each RabbitMQ cluster has multiple nodes (2).=
My platform I’m working with has 2 datacenters each with a RabbitMQ =
cluster. I need to configure RabbitMQ such that any message published to an=
y exchange on any node can be consumed by a queue on either cluster.<o:p></=
o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>From=
the web and also a support ticket/question with VMWare I am to understand =
that clustering across the WAN should not be done. I’ve been pointed =
at the shovel plugin to handle communications from one data center to the o=
ther. I’ve been experimenting with shovel a little to figure out how =
to do this, but I seem to have a loop going on where a published message fr=
om datacenter A goes to datacenter B, but then B goes ahead and shovels it =
right back to A (more than 800 times per second).<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3D=
MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>I’ve seen a video=
from 2009 (Tony Garnock-Jones) that discusses this and indicated that shov=
el was being modified to only handle this scenario to look at some labels t=
o determine if the message has been to the current node, and just drop it i=
f it has. This change does not appear to have happened, unless I̵=
7;m missing something.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p>=
</p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Does anyone have a similar scenario or know how to=
handle high availability peer-to-peer connections across a WAN with Rabbit=
MQ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoN=
ormal>-Wes<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>=
--_000_094044328C95D248A8E9678F35A6ACB54463C847F7SLCMAILBOXech_--
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list