[rabbitmq-discuss] looks like a memory leak, 2.4.1

Alexis Richardson alexis at rabbitmq.com
Thu Apr 28 10:41:35 BST 2011


Is there anything in the logs apart from VM alarms?

Can you show us some client code please?


On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Mark Geib <mark.geib at echostar.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We have rabbitmq 2.4.1 on debian squeeze, erlang is R14A.
>
> Currently we have a dozen or some queue and 2-3 exchanges with message
> rates of about 500/sec to 2000/sec over all the queues. These are all
> direct exchanges, but both the exchanges and queues are durable and
> all publishing is persistent.
>
> What we see is that the memory footprint of rabbitmq grows after
> running for just a couple to a few hours. And eventually we get VM
> alarms in the rabbitmq log. The funny thing is that we never queue up
> more a 10-50 messages in any queue, usually in the single digits. So
> the activity seems low, and the queue sizes are small, based on number
> of messages.
>
> We have seem this with 2.3.1 and then upgraded to 2.4.1 and see the
> same thing.
>
> With this level of usage, etc. this does not make sense. Any ideas.??
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> - --
> Principal Engineer
> Cheyenne Software Engineering
> mark.geib at echostar.com / 35-215
>
> PGP fingerprint:6DFC 389D 9796 0188 92E5 58F5 34C5 6B47 D091 76FD
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk24p0sACgkQNMVrR9CRdv0kCQCfVya+xhlE6cN6MCdICPjzdWJq
> kLQAnjgJQ+skYHgfirUatLLZxjjVhroc
> =HBcw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list