[rabbitmq-discuss] For speed, use Shovel or not?
ristretto.rb at gmail.com
Sun Apr 24 22:13:13 BST 2011
Suppose there are two servers connected across a WAN (read internet),
sending transient messages, with all else held constant what is the
faster method in terms of messages / sec: Two brokers and a Shovel,
one broker with a remote publisher, or one broker with a remote
consumer. (The last two cases might be really just one case.)
msg -> X -> Q -> Shovel -> X -> Q -> Consume
msg ---------------------------> X -> Q -> Consume
What if durability is required? Does this change the decision?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss