[rabbitmq-discuss] Thoughts from a new user

[Adam Nelson]

Matthias,

I'm kind of confused about your point.  Ubuntu isn't even beyond the 1.8
series and it's likely one of the most heavily used production distributions
of rabbitmq.

I don't know why there's pushback on this.  Everybody who responded to this
thread who uses Mac was +1 for simply including Homebrew in your
documentation.

Do whatever you want.

-Adam

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> Adam,
>
>
> Adam Nelson wrote:
>
>> The homebrew rabbitmq installation already exists and is maintained.
>>
>
> Who is maintaining it? For all official rabbit distributions which we do
> not maintain directly ourselves we know the individuals who maintain them
> and liaise with them for new releases, resolution of any problems reported
> to them about rabbit vs to us about their packaging, etc.
>
> Also, note that the rabbitmq formula is still stuck at version 2.0.0 nine
> days after 2.1.0 was released. And 2.0.0 itself took 13 days to appear. Now,
> to me 13 days seems quite ok, but what kind of turnaround do homebrew users
> generally expect? Contrast this, for example, with the latest release of
> Erlang/OTP, which came out on the same day as rabbit 2.1.0 and only took
> three days to appear in homebrew.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias.
>



-- 
Adam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100924/5f25c8a2/attachment.htm>