[rabbitmq-discuss] Acknowledging for the deletion of the message

[Kshitiz Garg]

By the way, *noAck=false* seems to propose that I want an acknowledgment and
not defer it...as *noAck=false* seems equivalent to *Ack=True* ?? please
confirm ...

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Kshitiz Garg <stephanion2002 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Mathhew/Simon,
>
> Thanks for your responses. I want to know that is the publisher is at all
> involved in the process when I consume with no_ack=false and then basic.ack
> messages after the processing ? I want to make sure that the publisher
> remains be free of any such impact.
>
> Regards,
> Kshitiz
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 07:14:43PM +0530, Kshitiz Garg wrote:
>> > My use-case is that the message should be deleted from the queue only
>> after
>> > some processing is completed at the consumer's side.
>>
>> Yes. Acknowledge the message after processing it. Thus consume or get
>> the message with noAck = false.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20101013/118144e4/attachment.htm>