[rabbitmq-discuss] SOAP over RabbitMQ

Tue Nov 16 21:26:47 GMT 2010

WCF RabbitMQ bindings works great and I am consuming Web services using the RabbitMQ binding with little change to our codebase.
I guess my question is if there are any plans(now or future) to have a custom AXIS2 or JAX-WS Transport for RabbitMQ since they are widely used SOAP stacks. This will greatly benifit the SOAP community so that the adoption of  AMQP is less of a barrier if a native AMQP transport client is available. Spring has one, and OpenAMQP has JMS over RabbitMQ. Also, I noticed on the AMQP org site that 1-0 SOAP Mapping <http://mail.cml.com/confluence/display/AMQP/1-0+SOAP+Mapping>   is proposed, but that may be months before approved and supported.

regards
hussein

________________________________

From: Emile Joubert [mailto:emile at rabbitmq.com]
Sent: Mon 11/15/2010 4:49 AM
To: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com; Hussein Said
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] SOAP over RabbitMQ

Hi Hussein,

On 13/11/10 17:06, Hussein Said wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if there is something equivalent to the WCF
> ServiceModel on the Java side.
> I  have a web service hosted in WCF that calls another web Service
> hosted on Axis2. I was able with relative ease
> To add the RabbitMQ binding on the .net side, and use SOAP as the
> protocol, and RabbitMQ as the transport using the RabbitMQ service model
> libraries. Now I would like to be able to do the same thing from the
> Java side using SOAP. This will allow us to leverage our current
> investments in SOAP, but use RabbitMQ powerful messaging infrastructure
> to transport over Queues.

In theory it should be possible to interoperate using a Java web
services library that speaks the correct flavour of SOAP, but I'm not
aware of anyone trying this using the RabbitMQ WCF binding specifically.
We would be interested to hear the results of your attempt.

Regards

Emile

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20101116/5ec226ad/attachment.htm>