[rabbitmq-discuss] Missing features making me look at moving off RabbitMQ
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Wed Nov 3 08:43:12 GMT 2010
On 01/11/10 18:46, Christian Legnitto wrote:
> Hmmm, I hadn't really thought of that, I'll look into it. You mean
> adding something like "secure.level.1" to the routing key and only
> letting certain users bind with with that?
I suspect Scott thought your "security tokens" were cryptographically
strong tokens the possession of which entitles a user to receive certain
> Is there a way to restrict bindings based on routing keys?
No. Though that is something a proxy could do.
> Also, wouldn't # and * bypass that?
No. Though again a proxy could prohibit such wildcard bindings.
It is unclear from your description of the problem how the
confidentiality constraints are expressed. Some piece of information
gets publish and should be routed only to those consumers which are
allowed to receive it. Leaving aside the specifics of rabbit, what would
the algorithm look like that decides whether a particular consumer
should receive the message? I.e. define the function
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss