[rabbitmq-discuss] Pika and Channel.Flow
Jason J. W. Williams
jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com
Sun May 23 20:17:24 BST 2010
Yeah...it's pretty much at the same usability level as py-amqplib due
to the lack of defined exceptions. You have to play with every
possible failure behavior to reverse engineer the exceptions that get
thrown that will indicate those behaviors.
Until Pika develops to have documented, predictable exceptions we're
going to stick with py-amqplib and txAMQP. Which is a shame because
Pika looks like it'll be a very good replacement for py-amqplib.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
>> What's the dev status on Pika? It seems rather unloved.
> I doubt the RabbitMQ core team will get much work done on pika in the next
> six months. Perhaps somebody else would like to step up to the plate?
> Are there any specific bug fixes / feature requests you have in mind?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss