[rabbitmq-discuss] Erlang has closed?

[Colin Clark]

Matthew - do you have any idea of when the new persister will go 
'mainstream?'

On 5/19/2010 9:55 AM, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:45:19AM -0400, tyler at echonest.com wrote:
>    
>> The server process does get busy, up to about 80% of the available cpu.
>> It uses all of the available memory, and crashes shortly after. (Shouldn't
>> it be pinning the queues to disk automatically, or do i need to use 21444
>> for that...?)
>>      
> The new persister will gently push messages to disk when memory gets
> tight. That is not the behaviour of default branch or any released
> version of Rabbit.
>
>    
>> The server never recovers, even if I kill all producers and most
>> consumers,  although the beam.smp process hangs on to all
>> the memory. I'm playing with 21444 now to see if i can replicate this.
>>      
> 21444 is ancient and should not be used. If you want to use the new
> persister, the correct branch is bug21673.
>
> Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>    
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100519/435b4eb4/attachment.htm