[rabbitmq-discuss] request for help!
mikeb at lshift.net
Thu May 6 15:55:10 BST 2010
Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Michael Bridgen wrote:
>> (Conflating those causes problems in 0-9-1 too by the way -- there's a
>> rather fraught, unresolved question in RabbitMQ's bugzilla about the
>> interaction between flow control and transactional acks. The last
>> comment says "In conclusion, after discussion, acks are overloaded,
>> and mean two things - 1. I've seen the msg; 2. forget about the msg.
> Can you point me to that issue?
Sadly, it's behind a firewall at the minute; but here is the list post
that gave rise to it:
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss