[rabbitmq-discuss] PHP Rabbit Extension

[Pieter de Zwart]

Hey Michael,

To be honest, Im poking in the dark. I have had repeated emails/tickets
about people having to add the connection parameter to our
amqp_get_rpc_reply call. Based on some limited research and chatting with
Tony, it seemed to me that requiring that function parameter meant that they
were using the 0-9-1 rabbitmq-c client header file, and therefore we running
the 0-9-1 client.
Does that answer your question, or did I miss the point?

Pieter


On 3/30/10 8:34 AM, "Michael Bridgen" <mikeb at lshift.net> wrote:

> Hi Pieter,
> 
> I cannot give a response on the C client -- I leave that to Tony --
> however I may be able to offer advice otherwise, since I worked on 0-9-1
> support in RabbitMQ.  When you say "people tell us [..] they were
> running 0-9-1" do you mean they are running RabbitMQ on the amqp_0_9_1
> branch?
> 
> Regards,
> Michael
> 
> Pieter de Zwart wrote:
>> > Alright, I am going to plead my case one more time. We have had a few
>> > people tell us that, since they were running 0-9-1, they needed to tweak
>> > our plugin for it to compile, always having to add that blasted
>> > connection parameter to amqp_get_rpc_reply. Is there ANY WAY you might
>> > consider adding compiler flags, like VERSION ³0-9-1² or something so
>> > that we can handle the different signatures transparently (unless you
>> > know of another way, or course)? I want to provide the best possible
>> > experiences to my users, particularly in these early days, and compiler
>> > errors don¹t sit well with me. If the signatures for a version change,
>> > so be it, it will be up to us to keep up with it.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Pieter
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/22/10 4:50 PM, "Tony Garnock-Jones" <tonyg at lshift.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Pieter de Zwart wrote:
>>> >     >  The only time we call amqp_get_rpc_reply right now is for our call
to
>>> >     >  amqp_channel_open after successfully creating a new connection.
This
>>> >     >  function returns amqp_channel_open_ok_t_, instead of the standard
>>> >     >  amqp_rpc_reply_t, so this is the correct place to use it, right?
>> >
>> >     That's right.
>> >
>>> >     >  Also, any chance you want to throw in a version string in the
>> >     AMQP.h so
>>> >     >  that we can have compiler level flags to handle these different
>>> >     >  situations? =)
>> >
>> >     Hmm. I sympathise, but I think it's too early for that: the API, while
>> >     reasonably stable seeming, is I think still best considered officially
>> >     unstable.
>> >
>> >     (You're aware there are a couple of tags in the hg repository now that
>> >     you might be able to use, right?)
>> >
>> >     Regards,
>> >       Tony
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > the rubicon project
>> >
>> > PIETER DE ZWART | INTERFACES ENGINEER
>> >
>> > €€€ P 310 207 0272 | x224
>> > €€€ F 323 466 7119
>> >
>> >
>> > 1925 S. BUNDY  DRIVE
>> > LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
>> >
>> > WWW.RUBICONPROJECT.COM <_http://www.rubiconproject.com/_>
>> >
>> >
>> > ³COMPANY OF THE YEAR² ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 2009
>> > #24 ON FAST COMPANY FAST 50 READER FAVORITES
>> > 2008  ALWAYSON 250 GLOBAL WINNER
>> > 2008 ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 100 WINNER
>> > TWIISTUP3  BEST IN SHOW
>> > PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ­ ENTRETECH  BEST STARTUP
>> > AMERICAN BUSINESS AWARDS - STEVIES  Œ08 FINALIST BEST NEW COMPANY
>> > AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES Œ08 FINALIST MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANY
>> > AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES Œ08 FINALIST NEW PRODUCT OR SERVICE
>> > -  SERVICES
>> >
>> > P          Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 

-- 
the rubicon project

PIETER DE ZWART | INTERFACES ENGINEER

€€€ P 310 207 0272 | x224
€€€ F 323 466 7119


1925 S. BUNDY  DRIVE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025

WWW.RUBICONPROJECT.COM <http://www.rubiconproject.com/>


³COMPANY OF THE YEAR² ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 2009
#24 ON FAST COMPANY FAST 50 READER FAVORITES
2008  ALWAYSON 250 GLOBAL WINNER
2008 ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 100 WINNER
TWIISTUP3  BEST IN SHOW
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ­ ENTRETECH  BEST STARTUP
AMERICAN BUSINESS AWARDS - STEVIES  Œ08 FINALIST BEST NEW COMPANY
AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES Œ08 FINALIST MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANY
AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES Œ08 FINALIST NEW PRODUCT OR SERVICE -
SERVICES

P          Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100330/5980b6b7/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 28320 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100330/5980b6b7/attachment.png