[rabbitmq-discuss] status of available message buses compatible with Java client

Wed Jun 30 18:45:05 BST 2010

Great. Would you mind posting the location of the git repo when it
becomes available? I'd like to stay on top of changes. Also, is there
a better way to communicate about spring amqp other than this
discussion thread?

Shane

On Jun 29, 1:07 pm, Mark Pollack <mpoll... at vmware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are moving to git today/tomorrow.  There will be some changes in terms of moving some admin functionality around the maven modules and internal structuring of the erlang mappings to rabbit function.  
>
> We are also going to shift to a simplistic resource model for M1 instead of caching channels as we need more time to get the resource management correct.  The issue is that we really need to cache connection/channels pairs since an error on a single channel ends up effecting the whole connection - this means all async consumers are effected and stop processing based on the behavior of one consumer.  
>
> Yea, July 9th is still our target date, no docs yet and we need more integration testing as well :)
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rabbitmq-discuss-boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com [mailto:rabbitmq-
> > discuss-boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com] On Behalf Of Shane
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:24 PM
> > To: rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] status of available message buses
> > compatible with Java client
>
> > Hi Mark,
>
> > I appreciate your replies. You've helped to solidify some of my design
> > decisions including using your unreleased spring-amqp project. I've
> > noticed that there hasn't been any commits to the subversion repo you
> > pointed me to. Have you already moved to git? I also noticed the
> > documentation is not there yet and I assume you are working on that
> > now. I know you mentioned a July 9th date for an initial release but
> > I'd be interested in any other changes before then if that's cool?
>
> > Thanks again
>
> > On Jun 24, 4:44 pm, Mark Pollack <mpoll... at vmware.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Was not planning on it for M1.  We need to see what the impact is on
> > the underlying APIs, but it will certainly be a roadmap item if not
> > addressed in M1.
>
> > > Mark
>
> > > (yes - another Mark working on the same thing at SpringSource :)
>
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: rabbitmq-discuss-boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com [mailto:rabbitmq-
> > > > discuss-boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com] On Behalf Of Shane
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:33 PM
> > > > To: rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] status of available message buses
> > > > compatible with Java client
>
> > > > Awesome. I noticed that the code isn't currently compatible with
> > > > version 1.8 of the java client. Are you planning on supporting 1.8
> > in
> > > > the short term?
>
> > > > On Jun 24, 11:30 am, Mark Fisher <markfis... at vmware.com> wrote:
> > > > > Shane,
>
> > > > > We are planning to release the first milestone (1.0.0.M1) on
> > Friday
> > > > July 9th.
>
> > > > > -Mark
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > From: rabbitmq-discuss-boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com [rabbitmq-
> > discuss-
> > > > boun... at lists.rabbitmq.com] On Behalf Of Shane
> > > > [sh... at digitalsanctum.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:40 AM
> > > > > To: rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] status of available message buses
> > > > compatible    with Java client
>
> > > > > Mark,
>
> > > > > I've started looking at the code it's looking good. Any estimate
> > on
> > > > > when an initial public version will be available?
>
> > > > > Shane
>
> > > > > On Jun 23, 8:09 pm, Mark Fisher <markfis... at vmware.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Shane, see my replies inline...
>
> > > > > > On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Shane wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I'm still feeling my way around RabbitMQ (as you might have
> > > > noticed
> > > > > > > from the number of posts I've written lately). One decision
> > I'm
> > > > > > > wrestling with is what to use for message routing with the
> > Java
> > > > > > > client. I've started looking into the following:
>
> > > > > > > - Writing my own helper classes with Spring
> > > > > > > - Apache Camel
> > > > > > > - Spring Integration with OpenCredo's contributions (amq
> > > > template, amq
> > > > > > > spring integration)
>
> > > > > > We will soon be releasing the first milestone of our Spring
> > AMQP
> > > > project. That includes support at the same basic level as Spring's
> > JMS
> > > > support (AmqpTemplate, SimpleMessageListenerContainers for Message-
> > > > driven POJOs, MessageConverter strategies, and more). We will be
> > > > providing Spring Integration Channel Adapters, Gateways, etc. that
> > will
> > > > build on top of that functionality.
>
> > > > > > > Since RabbitMQ was recently acquired by SpringSource, SI
> > > > w/OpenCredo
> > > > > > > seems like the natural choice but there hasn't been any
> > > > development on
> > > > > > > the OpenCredo stuff since March? (looking at github).
>
> > > > > > We're going to be collaborating with OpenCredo on the project I
> > > > mentioned above, and that project is actually quite active already.
> > > > However, as I mentioned, we're just now approaching the first
> > milestone
> > > > release. We'll be moving to Git any moment now, but until it's
> > moved,
> > > > you can browse the current codebase
> > > > here:https://src.springsource.org/svn/se-amqp/trunk/(afterthemove
> > it
> > > > will be at git.springsource.org/spring-amqp)
>
> > > > > > > Although Apache Camel seems to be more mature, I'd rather go
> > the
> > > > > > > Spring Integration route since all of our apps already use
> > Spring
> > > > for
> > > > > > > dependency injection, etc.
>
> > > > > > As the lead of Spring Integration, I'm a bit biased. That said,
> > if
> > > > your main concern is having a solid (and "mature" I might add)
> > Spring
> > > > foundation with implementations that are absolutely consistent with
> > > > Spring, then Spring Integration is probably the best choice (and
> > 2.0 GA
> > > > is only a couple months away).
>
> > > > > > > Can someone from Rabbit comment on the state of development
> > with
> > > > > > > respect to integration with Spring? Is the contributions from
> > > > > > > OpenCredo going to be used?
>
> > > > > > Hopefully this question has been answered above. Let me know if
> > > > there is anything that I missed.
>
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Mark
>
> > > > > > > I'm also interested in other message bus solutions people are
> > > > using
> > > > > > > with the Java client.
>
> > > > > > > Thanks again,
> > > > > > > Shane
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > > > > > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > > > > > >http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-
> > > > discuss
>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > > > > rabbitmq-
> > disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttp://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-
> > > > bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > > > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttp://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-
> > > > bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > > > rabbitmq-
> > disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttps://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-
> > > > bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > > >https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttps://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-
> > bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> >https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttps://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss