[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ 1.8.0 release

[techabc]

AMQP 1.0 has been voted as "Recommended"
status<http://www.amqp.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4489238>
.
Dose rabbitMQ follow it? And the Roadmap?

2010/6/17 Ilya Grigorik <ilya at postrank.com>

> Aha, thanks for the tip Matthew.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:02:08PM -0400, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
>> > One of our rabbit servers is ~7GB RAM, and I know that if we push over
>> 250K
>> > messages into it (heavy messages), and the server hits swap, the server
>> > starts crawling.. to the tune of being able to get only a few messages a
>> > second (out). Meaning, we need to nuke the entire queue to bring the
>> server
>> > back to functional.
>>
>> You need to be using the new persister branch - compile from source, but
>> set the server to use branch "bug21673". The raison d'être of the new
>> persister is to solve problems such as the one you describe.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100617/a45ff0fe/attachment.htm>