[rabbitmq-discuss] message availability after close without ack

[Matthew Sackman]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:19PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:23:42PM -0400, Tim Cole wrote:
> > My understanding had been that if a consumer is canceled (and its
> > channel closed) without having acked delivered messages, then those
> > messages become available to later consumers on the same queue.
> 
> You're understanding is correct - the key part is the channel being
> closed.

Apologies. I shall return to school now to be taught the difference
between your and you're.

Matthew