[rabbitmq-discuss] Claim on new ocamlmq broker...
alexis at rabbitmq.com
Mon Jun 14 19:56:41 BST 2010
Yes, it's bs.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
<jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> This new OCAML STOMP broker makes this claim about Rabbit on it's page:
> "RabbitMQ did not guarantee that persistent messages had been saved to
> disk before sending the message receipt, which could lead to data
> Anyone else seen this behavior...I surely haven't. Messages disappear
> in a cluster due to the way queues are handled...but I've never seen
> this in a single instance.
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss