[rabbitmq-discuss] Ordering of messages after txRollback()

[Matthew Sackman]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:03:42PM -0400, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> > If you rollback a transaction, messages for which an ack was in the now
> > rolled back transaction ARE NOT requeued.
> 
> This seems rather counter-intuitive.

Transactions only cover publishes and acks sent from the client to the
broker. Nothing more. They cover nothing that is sent from broker to the
client.

Matthew