[rabbitmq-discuss] messages delivery question

Mon Jul 26 08:30:23 BST 2010

Is it possible to make the transactional channel not transactional?
I expect a NO answer, but better to be 100% sure than have a guess

2010/7/25 Scott Brooks <scott at beamdog.com>

> You can just call ch.TxCommit again.
>
> Once you call ch.TxSelect(), you need to commit to complete the
> transaction.  A Commit implicitly starts another transaction.
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 09:10:26PM +0300, Andrius Norkaitis wrote:
> >> I was reusing one channel to publish messages. Should I create two
> channels
> >> (one transactional, one not) and reuse them or it better always create
> new
> >> one?
> >
> > Better to have two channels and keep them open. At your msg rates, it's
> > not so important, but generally channel creation isn't /that/ cheap an
> > operation, so best to keep them open after creation.
> >
> > Matthew
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>

-- 
Linkėjimai, Best Regards

Darius Damalakas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100726/83c4b288/attachment.htm>