[rabbitmq-discuss] New Persister merged into default

[Brett Cameron]

5672 - spooky!

John and I will have to give the new persister a spin on OpenVMS.

Brett

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:19:58AM +0200, John Apps wrote:
> > Congratulations to one and all!
>
> Many thanks, for everyone's patience with this and for the early
> adopters who bravely tested this code whilst it was in development and
> helped us by reporting bugs as they found them.
>
> > All in all, then, you only changed some 7679 lines of code? [?]
>
> The final merge to default was just 5762 lines. However, large amounts
> of refactorings and abstraction had already made it to default - for
> example we now have an API for developing backing-queues against, which
> (currently) allows you to select between the new persister and the old
> (and allows others to experiment with writing further persisters), and
> was originally developed as part of the new persister but the
> infrastructure there made it onto default much sooner and has been part
> of the last couple of releases. As a result, I've no idea really how to
> work out the number of LoC that originated with the new persister which
> have now made it to default.
>
> > I am really looking forward to trying the new persister out, having had
> lots
> > of fun and games with the old one...
>
> Indeed! I'm looking forwards to your reports - I'm hoping you're going
> to report it's suddenly become much much harder to make Rabbit crash ;)
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100723/c992008b/attachment-0001.htm>