[rabbitmq-discuss] New Persister merged into default
brett.r.cameron at gmail.com
Fri Jul 23 09:38:55 BST 2010
5672 - spooky!
John and I will have to give the new persister a spin on OpenVMS.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:19:58AM +0200, John Apps wrote:
> > Congratulations to one and all!
> Many thanks, for everyone's patience with this and for the early
> adopters who bravely tested this code whilst it was in development and
> helped us by reporting bugs as they found them.
> > All in all, then, you only changed some 7679 lines of code? [?]
> The final merge to default was just 5762 lines. However, large amounts
> of refactorings and abstraction had already made it to default - for
> example we now have an API for developing backing-queues against, which
> (currently) allows you to select between the new persister and the old
> (and allows others to experiment with writing further persisters), and
> was originally developed as part of the new persister but the
> infrastructure there made it onto default much sooner and has been part
> of the last couple of releases. As a result, I've no idea really how to
> work out the number of LoC that originated with the new persister which
> have now made it to default.
> > I am really looking forward to trying the new persister out, having had
> > of fun and games with the old one...
> Indeed! I'm looking forwards to your reports - I'm hoping you're going
> to report it's suddenly become much much harder to make Rabbit crash ;)
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss