[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ (branch bug21673) running out of file descriptors

Andrey Smirnov smirnov.andrey at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 15:49:57 GMT 2010


24 hours with new version - still running fine.

Thanks for the quick fix!

2010/2/18 Andrey Smirnov <smirnov.andrey at gmail.com>:
> Thanks a lot, Matthew!
>
> Rebuilt from source, running currently with new version. Will report
> back how it goes.
>
> Actually I have about 13 TCP connections to broker and this number is
> pretty steady.
>
> 2010/2/18 Matthew Sackman <matthew at lshift.net>:
>> Hi Andrey,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:58:34AM +0300, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>>> We're running RabbitMQ from branch bug21673 (built yesterday). We have
>>> a lot of non-persisten queues (2k - 10k+) that are created/destroyed
>>> all the time. Some queues have unconsumed messaged and they will get
>>> destroyed with unconsumed messages.
>>>
>>> When file descriptor limit for RabbitMQ was left to default 1024 files
>>> it was dying in 2 hours. I've raised the limit to 10240 files and it
>>> worked for 16 hours and crashed.
>>>
>>> Crash for clients looks like "INTERNAL_ERROR" error on connections.
>>> RabbitMQ is still running and eating 100% of CPU. Restarting RabbitMQ
>>> helps to revive it.
>>
>> Many thanks for the bug report. The short version is that this is now
>> Fixed - if you pull again and rebuild, it should all "just work" now.
>> The long version is in the commit comment
>> (http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-server/rev/56a0daed8b4e). I can now
>> artificially limit Rabbit to approx 3 file descriptors, and it still
>> runs some fairly aggressive tests perfectly well. Note that whilst on
>> branch bug21673, Rabbit is able to very flexibly redistribute file
>> handles as necessary, this obviously doesn't apply to sockets. So you
>> should make sure you always have at least, say, 100 more file
>> descriptors available to Rabbit than you need sockets.
>>
>> Please try retesting - provided you don't have more than about 900
>> simultaneous connections open, you shouldn't need to raise the ulimit
>> above 1024, though you might find performance improves if you do.
>>
>> Do let us know how you get on.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey Smirnov,
> phone. +7 (905) 769-83-20
>



-- 
Andrey Smirnov,
phone. +7 (905) 769-83-20




More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list