[rabbitmq-discuss] Licensing of librabbitmq

Marcus Eriksson krummas at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 08:24:02 GMT 2010


Hi

No, I dont think they have to be GPL. Is, for example, BSD licensing my
plugin a solution to this problem?

/Marcus

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Alexis Richardson <
alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marcus
>
> That sounds great and we would love to help.  Can you tell me what
> licenses are used for Drizzle plugins?  Must they all be GPL?
>
> alexis
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Marcus Eriksson <krummas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I am building a plugin for Drizzle to be able to replicate transactions
> > directly to rabbitmq using librabbitmq (
> http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-c/)
> > but there is an issue with the licensing of librabbitmq;
> > Drizzle is a fork off mysql and therefor GPL and librabbitmq is MPL. The
> MPL
> > states that it cannot be linked to GPL software
> > (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#MPL).
> > Is there any way round this?
> > /Marcus Eriksson
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100209/d783e58a/attachment.htm 


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list