[rabbitmq-discuss] redelivered count

[John DeTreville]

Well, I understand that part.

But if suspected bad messages are to be delayed for a while, am I right to imagine that other messages would not be delayed? That is, messages would be reordered?

Cheers,
John

On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:

> Hey John,
> 
> I think the intent is to keep a message that's crashing a consumer
> from being endlessly retried.
> 
> -J
> 
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:15 PM, John DeTreville <jdetreville at vmware.com> wrote:
>> I'm a little confused. Would messages be reordered? Is the idea to move from message queues to something else?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> John
>> 
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Justin Etheredge wrote:
>> 
>>> It would interesting and useful if there was some way to see a redelivered count on a message. And as a little icing on the cake, it would be useful to be able to specify how long before a message is redelivered. That way if I specify that a message can be redelivered at most 10 times, it won't happen in a thousandth of a second. Any thoughts on this?
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>