[rabbitmq-discuss] redelivered count

[Justin Etheredge]

Agreed that dead letter queues are a big deal. Which is why expiration on
messages doesn't do me much good right now, unless I am missing something. I
can't have a message expire and just disappear, I need to be able to respond
to it.

Justin Etheredge
Company: http://www.ecstaticlabs.com
Blog: http://www.codethinked.com
Twitter: @JustinEtheredge



On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <
jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:

> With basic.reject now being implemented, I'd definitely like to see
> "dead letter" queues get a priority. Agree they fit well the TTLs.
>
> -J
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Matthias Radestock
> <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> > Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd like to see the new queue TTLs extended to handle this...specify a
> >> message's lifetime by redeliver count instead of/in addition to age. I
> >> think the redeliver count would still be useful information for a
> >> consumer to know, but it seems to me the broker should be handling the
> >> mechanics of expiration.
> >
> > Before we add yet more ways for messages to disappear from a queue, we
> want
> > to introduce a means by which they can disappear to somewhere other than
> the
> > ether. i.e. dead-letter exchanges. Which we will probably implement at
> some
> > point.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Matthias.
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20101207/2a784422/attachment.htm>