[rabbitmq-discuss] Broker to Broker communication...

[Matthias Radestock]

Jeff,

Chris Chew wrote:
>Jeff Bannister wrote:
>> App B--->Exchange A-->Queue-->Exchange B-->Queue-->App A
> [...]
> With shovel, the flow would look more like this:
> 
>           [ ......... Broker A .......... ]          [ ..... Broker B ..... ]
> App B --> Exchange A --> Queue A --> Shovel -+WAN+-> Exchange B --> Queue --> App B

rabbitmq-shovel is certainly one option. But do you actually need two 
brokers in the first place? Why not co-locate the broker with either the 
sending or the receiving side?


Regards,

Matthias.