[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbit_binary_parser:ensure_content_decoded/2 - why /2 rather than /1?
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Sat Aug 7 20:01:38 BST 2010
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> In rabbit_binary_parser.erl, what used to be ensure_content_decoded/1 is now
> endure_content_decoded/2 [...]
> Shouldn't it be /1 as before, and decide which protocol to use based on
Probably. The /2 was introduced before #content.protocol existed and
iirc we kept it for symmetry w ensure_content_encoded/2. I have filed a
bug to look into this.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss