[rabbitmq-discuss] per-queue message TTLs [was Re: Bound Queues]

[Bryan Murphy]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at lshift.net>
> wrote:
> >> if only it were a per *queue* ttl, it'd be so much easier!
> > ttl's on a queue level would be very useful to us
>
> That's a really interesting idea, and it is a lot easier to implement
> than per-message TTLs.
>
> So here is a question to all RabbitMQ users who have been asking /
> secretly wishing for TTLs: Would per-queue TTLs, i.e. all messages
> getting the same TTL when they are enqueued, be good enough (or even
> preferable) for you? Or do you definitely need to be able to specify
> TTLs on per-message basis (and if so, what is the use case)?
>
>
We'd find per-queue TTLs very useful.

Bryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100414/54c7f281/attachment.htm