[rabbitmq-discuss] Rabbitmq-c compatibility

Mon Apr 5 17:31:01 BST 2010

Well, until about 5 minutes ago there were no plans, but I am always up for a challenge =)
Before I go through all the work though, I need to finish all the clean up required to make it an official PHP extension, so the potential start date is about 1 to 2 weeks out.
Ill start asking around in the meantime, but can you also validate that the current php-rabbit project on Google Code has all of the necessary functionality you are looking for?

Thanks,
Pieter

________________________________

From: Mark Steele <msteele at beringmedia.com> 
To: Pieter de Zwart 
Cc: tonyg at lshift.net <tonyg at lshift.net>; rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com <rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com> 
Sent: Mon Apr 05 09:46:59 2010
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Rabbitmq-c compatibility 

Quick question sort of related to both the C client and the php client...

How hard would it be to get SSL support (including client certificates)? We're currently using a pure PHP implementation which we use with SSL support and would love to switch to a librabbit based solution, however we need the SSL support. Thoughts?

Creating the SSL socket stream context in PHP is trivial, might it be possible to pass the stream file descriptor to librabbit in some fashion? (or any plans on supporting SSL by linking in openssl to librabbit?)

Cheers,

Mark Steele
Director of development
Bering Media Inc.

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Pieter de Zwart <pdezwart at rubiconproject.com> wrote:

	That is awesome, thank you very much Tony!
	Pieter

	----- Original Message -----
	From: Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at lshift.net>
	To: Pieter de Zwart
	Cc: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com <rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
	Sent: Sat Apr 03 14:08:39 2010
	Subject: Re: Rabbitmq-c compatibility

	Hi Pieter,

	It is intended to be, yes. At the 0-9-1 protocol version it definitely
	works with Qpid and OpenAMQ (I've tried it), though the 0-8 version
	doesn't interoperate so smoothly because of differing interpretations of
	the spec. I'd therefore recommend calling the extension "AMQP" instead
	of "rabbitmq".

	Regards,
	  Tony

	Pieter de Zwart wrote:
	> This is a RabbitMQ-c question, but I figure I would send it to the
	> entire list as well.
	>
	> Is rabbitmq-c compatible with other brokers implementing the AMQP spec?
	> The reason I ask is that I submitting our php extension to the PECL
	> directory, which is where official PHP extensions are listed/maintained,
	> and I want to name this project appropriately. Therefore, if the
	> rabbitmq-c client implements the AMQP client standards (if any,) the PHP
	> extension should be called “amqp” and not “rabbbitmq”, and we should
	> name our classes/variables/etc appropriately.
	>
	> Thanks,
	> Pieter
	> --
	> the rubicon project
	>
	> PIETER DE ZWART | INTERFACES ENGINEER
	>
	> ••• P 310 207 0272 | x224
	> ••• F 323 466 7119
	>
	>
	> 1925 S. BUNDY  DRIVE
	> LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
	>
	> WWW.RUBICONPROJECT.COM <_http://www.rubiconproject.com/_>
	>
	>
	> “COMPANY OF THE YEAR” ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 2009
	> #24 ON FAST COMPANY FAST 50 READER FAVORITES
	> 2008  ALWAYSON 250 GLOBAL WINNER
	> 2008 ALWAYSON ONMEDIA 100 WINNER
	> TWIISTUP3  BEST IN SHOW
	> PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS – ENTRETECH  BEST STARTUP
	> AMERICAN BUSINESS AWARDS - STEVIES  ‘08 FINALIST BEST NEW COMPANY
	> AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES ‘08 FINALIST MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANY
	> AMERICAN BUSINESS  AWARDS - STEVIES ‘08 FINALIST NEW PRODUCT OR SERVICE
	> -  SERVICES
	>
	> P          Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

	_______________________________________________
	rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
	rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
	http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100405/347f1820/attachment.htm 