[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ throughput

Fri Oct 2 05:31:05 BST 2009

I use basic_consume and basic_ack
Suhail

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Gavin M. Roy <gmr at myyearbook.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, tsuraan <tsuraan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, are you using basic_get, or basic_consume?  I've
>> found that basic_get has performance like that, whereas basic_consume
>> is at least 10x faster.  I'm also using persistent messages with
>> explicit ack (in transactional mode), and using Barry's python library
>> I get in the 1k - 10k messages/second range on hardware that isn't any
>> better than yours.
>
>
> I have to second this sentiment about basic_consume vs basic_get.  The
> performance of basic_get is terrible to be honest, it also does not scale
> across multiple consumers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gavin
>

-- 
http://mixpanel.com
Blog: http://blog.mixpanel.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20091001/26d38a43/attachment.htm 