[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ + MySQL

[Suhail Doshi]

Ask,
READ-COMMITED did not seem to work, any other ideas? I don't wish to change
my engine to MyISAM =)

Suhail

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <
jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:

> Depending on your requirements MyISAM can be a better choice. The
> table-wide locks are lightning fast, and can work better in a high
> concurrency insert environment than InnoDB. But you lose ACID so you
> have to make sure you're replicating to another box for data
> integrity.
>
> -J
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Suhail Doshi<digitalwarfare at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Anyone using rabbitmq with lots of consumers along with MySQL and hitting
> > dead locks if you run too many consumers, any smart way to deal with
> that?
> > My theory was sharding on some distinct id and sending only some data to
> > specific consumers based on an id...
> > Ideas? Suggestions?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> >
> >
>



-- 
http://mixpanel.com
Blog: http://blog.mixpanel.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20090831/dd75fd1f/attachment.htm