[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ + MySQL
digitalwarfare at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 17:10:02 BST 2009
READ-COMMITED did not seem to work, any other ideas? I don't wish to change
my engine to MyISAM =)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <
jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> Depending on your requirements MyISAM can be a better choice. The
> table-wide locks are lightning fast, and can work better in a high
> concurrency insert environment than InnoDB. But you lose ACID so you
> have to make sure you're replicating to another box for data
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Suhail Doshi<digitalwarfare at gmail.com>
> > Anyone using rabbitmq with lots of consumers along with MySQL and hitting
> > dead locks if you run too many consumers, any smart way to deal with
> > My theory was sharding on some distinct id and sending only some data to
> > specific consumers based on an id...
> > Ideas? Suggestions?
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss